Clock+ does not make Povray a video editor. I have used Povray for creating technical animations \ Movies since 1996 but it's not a video editor. I totally agree - Blender is a great program but does not belong in this section and shows a lack of technical moderation. It is not as usable as a dedicated Non Linear Editor such as Cinellera, but it does work. Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.229.77 ( talk) 21:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Reply īlender has a sequencer (video editor) built in (see and following pages). There are a LOT of other programs on the NLE lists that either are not for editing at all (Wax) or which are currently unusable for editing (Jahshaka). Liastnir 13:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Reply Blender has changed a lot since I used to use it regularly, and yes it does now include some quite useful video editing, details of which can be found at mmj ( talk) 04:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Reply I don't believe Blender is a video editing program in the sense the rest of these are.
( talk) 17:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Reply Possibility of Including Another Program Under "Video encoding and conversion tools"
There is commercial free software, and there is commercial freeware, too.- J. I suggest a list like this:ĭanylstrype ( talk) 12:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Reply Commercial does not mean that it is not free/gratis.
Considering the main reason a person would look for a list like this is to find software to use for a video-editing project, I think the order of significance is 1) libre/ proprietary, 2) client-side (desktop/ mobile)/ server-side, 3) gratis (free of charge)/ commercial. It seems to me that there are three distinctions a user needs to know about.
Best regards, Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC) Reply The categorization here is still a bit confusing, since as ] says, there is free code software that is commercial, such as Kaltura. See )! - MaxBruckner 11:36, 07 September 2012 (UTC) Reply ĭone Hello. What is called "proprietary software" in this article should be called commercial software (and even this wouldn't be correct, since there is commercial open source software and commercial free software. The distinction between Freeware and proprietary software is void because Freeware is proprietary software.This one is more comparable to List of antivirus software or List of word processors. Comparison of instant messaging clients is more comparable to Comparison of video editing software than it is to this page.Agreed, I'd suggest a list looking like this one - Comparison of instant messaging clients.LetterRip 06:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Preferable would be a have a complete alphabetical list with price or freeware listed beside it as is currently done with the platform information.
There seems no logical reason why the list should be separated based on commercial or freeware.Shouldn't it be the "Vegas Family" or just "Vegas" instead of explicitly mentioning "Sony Vegas MovieStudio+DVD" (the low-end version of the Vegas programs)? It can in principle do everything one might ever need when editing videos (although it might be to clumsy to work on the command line). Is mencoder not much more than an encoder? I mean, it has cutlist and pipe support and can therefore do much more than just encoding. Videoqualia ( talk) 18:45, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Reply These are very different in purpose and usage. One for editing software and one for encoder. There should clearly be 2 distinct list / page. Blackcats 03:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC) Reply Others are welcome to make changes and/or discuss it more here.
I'd like to change this list such that it distinguishes between softwares that are just encoders and those that can actually be used for non-linear video editing.